The Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Present and Future of Accounting and the Accounting Profession

Te­t­ya­na Slyoz­ko PhD, As­so­ci­a­te Pro­fes­sor, Na­ta­liya Za­ho­rod­nya PhD, As­so­ci­a­te Pro­fes­sor, Sci­en­ce and Re­se­arch Ins­ti­tu­te of So­ci­al and Eco­no­mic De­ve­lop­ment.

Sum­ma­ry

It has been pro­ven that in the fu­tu­re ac­count­ing will not only sur­vive in the eco­nomy as the base of in­for­ma­ti­on and a re­gu­la­to­ry ins­ti­tu­ti­on, but with the help of in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gi­es, it will even imp­ro­ve and help eli­mi­na­te sha­dow eco­nomy. The ac­count­ing pro­fes­si­on will cert­ainly un­der­go changes, and will inc­re­a­singly make use of soft­ware in prac­ti­ce.


Sta­te­ment of the prob­lem. In sci­en­ti­fic circ­les it is dis­cus­sed that the fo­urth in­dust­ri­al re­vo­lu­ti­on is lo­om­ing in the eco­nomy and the so­ci­ety, and will make a lot of jobs re­dun­dant, inc­lu­ding ac­count­ing. Is it true that the ac­count­ing pro­fes­si­on will no lon­ger be in need? For over five cent­uri­es this pro­fes­si­on has had an im­por­tant role in the so­ci­al and eco­no­mic sys­tem of every count­ry. Ac­count­ing re­gu­lates so­ci­al and eco­no­mic re­la­tions and pro­vi­des the ne­ces­sary in­for­ma­ti­on. Se­e­king to know the fu­tu­re of ac­count­ing as a pro­fes­si­on, first the cur­rent place and role of ac­count­ing in so­ci­ety and the eco­nomy needs to be cons­idered.

Analy­ses of re­se­arch papers on the place and role of ac­count­ing as a so­ci­al-eco­no­mic ins­ti­tu­ti­on, the role of ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on in the eco­nomy and changes in the pro­fes­si­on under the inf­lu­en­ce of in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gists are in the focus of at­tent­ion. The sta­ke­hold­ers in this issue inc­lu­de Y. Hrynchyshyn,1 O. Kant­su­rov,2 S. Kuz­net­so­va,3 M. Med­ve­dev,4 N. Tsvyet­ko­va,5 V. Zhuk6 and the aut­hors of this ar­tic­le.7 Howe­ver, so far, none of the stu­di­es has raised the quest­ion of the role of ac­count­ing in the eco­nomy in the pers­pec­tive of the fo­urth in­dust­ri­al re­vo­lu­ti­on.

A. Borg8 and K. Sch­wab9 re­ve­al the fu­tu­re ahead of us: a ra­di­cal trans­for­ma­ti­on in emp­loy­ment, inc­lu­ding the disap­pe­arance of nu­me­rous jobs, and the re­sult­ing dec­line in tax re­ve­nues. At the same time, re­vo­lu­ti­on­ary changes in the eco­nomy will und­o­ub­tedly imp­ro­ve in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­logy, bo­ost­ing the re­ta­il sale of goods, shif­ted to­wards on­line com­mer­ce. This will again re­du­ce both taxes (inc­lu­ding value added tax) and the num­ber of jobs (and con­se­qu­ently, taxes on wages and so­ci­al char­ges on sa­la­ri­es).

In Borg’s opin­ion,10 the fo­urth in­dust­ri­al re­vo­lu­ti­on will dra­ma­ti­cally chan­ge de­mand for emp­loye­es: highly skil­led and well-paid emp­loye­es and unsk­il­led and low­pa­id wor­kers will be in need, and this will lead to the el­bo­wing out of the midd­le class from the labor mar­ket. Cur­rently this is the lar­gest class in so­ci­ety and the gu­a­ran­tor of de­moc­racy in the world, so its disp­lace­ment would cause an inc­re­as­ed num­ber of prob­lems in so­ci­ety. All the abo­ve-ment­ion­ed fac­tors will have a mas­sive im­pact on the role of ac­count­ing, and thus the ac­count­ing pro­fes­si­on, which has had an im­por­tant role in the eco­nomy for over a cent­ury. This is the rea­son why the fu­tu­re role of the ac­count­ing pro­fes­si­on in the mo­dern eco­no­mic sys­tem needs to be expla­ined.

Pur­po­se of the ar­tic­le: To show the cur­rent and fu­tu­re sig­ni­fi­cance of ac­count­ing in the eco­nomy under the con­di­tions of the fo­urth in­dust­ri­al re­vo­lu­ti­on.

Re­sults of the re­se­arch. In order to re­ve­al the fu­tu­re role of ac­count­ing, first of all its cur­rent role needs to be iden­ti­fi­ed. Ac­coun­tancy has a mul­tip­le role in the so­ci­o­e­co­no­mic sys­tem: on the one hand, it shows the es­sen­ce of the facts of eco­no­mic life and en­sures their legal evi­den­ce, on the other, it has a func­ti­on in every sec­tor of the eco­nomy (in­dustry, ag­ri­cul­tu­re, con­struc­ti­on, all types of tran­sport, trade, to­u­rism and the hotel busi­ness etc.), thirdly, it of­fers the op­por­tunity to re­ve­al the ef­fi­ci­ency of eco­no­mic ac­ti­vi­ti­es, in the fo­urth place, ac­count­ing is a means to ad­just the legal as­pect of busi­ness pro­ces­ses, it con­firms their le­gi­ti­macy and fea­si­bi­lity; crea­tes a re­la­ti­onship bet­ween the eco­nomy and law in the pro­cess of com­mer­ci­al ac­ti­vi­ti­es, and fi­n­ally, ac­count­ing is or­ga­ni­zed by a tar­ge­ted pro­cess of ob­tain­ing and trans­mitt­ing in­for­ma­ti­on about the facts of eco­no­mic ac­ti­vi­ti­es.

These mul­tip­le roles of ac­count­ing in the eco­nomy can be clas­si­fi­ed in two gro­ups: on the one hand, it is an in­for­ma­ti­on base that sa­tis­fi­es the re­quests of users to in­for­ma­ti­on about the ac­ti­vi­ti­es of busi­nes­ses; and on the other hand, it is one of the most im­por­tant ins­ti­tu­tions of so­cio-eco­no­mic sys­tem, th­ro­ugh which the eco­nomy est­ab­lis­hed the “rules of the game”, that must be fol­lo­wed by all ent­rep­re­ne­urs and busi­nes­ses. These units can be stu­di­ed in two ways: the role of ac­count­ing in the mo­dern eco­nomy and the role of the ac­count­ing pro­fes­si­on in the fu­tu­re.

The role of ac­count­ing in mo­dern eco­no­mi­es. As it is well-known, the ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on co­vers most of the in­for­ma­ti­on sys­tem of an en­ter­pri­se, and it is used by the spe­ci­a­lists of the ad­mi­nistra­tive ap­pa­ra­tus for plan­ning, eco­no­mic analy­ses, au­di­ting, and the com­pi­la­ti­on of va­ri­o­us forms of re­port­ing. Ac­count­ing cont­rols the per­for­mance of the tar­gets du­ring the re­port­ing pe­ri­od and pro­vi­des in­for­ma­ti­on for plan­ning and fo­re­casting eco­no­mic de­ve­lop­ment. Eco­no­mic analy­sis is based on ac­count­ing data, and ma­na­gers us them to study the rea­sons for de­vi­a­tions from the plan, iden­ti­fy re­ser­ves for the imp­ro­ve­ment of ef­fi­ci­ency in busi­ness ac­ti­vity, and check comp­li­ance with the leg­i­sla­tive re­gu­la­tions gover­ning busi­ness re­la­ti­onsh­ips. Ac­count­ing data are also used for over­se­e­ing de­ve­lop­ment in a count­ry’s eco­nomy; and ac­count­ing in­di­ca­tors are wi­dely used for sta­tis­ti­cal ge­ne­ra­li­za­tions.

For this rea­son, the lar­gest part of the in­for­ma­ti­on sys­tem of a com­pany comp­ri­ses ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on on the re­ce­ipt and use of ma­te­ri­al and fi­nan­cial re­sour­ces and pro­duc­ti­on pro­ces­ses, and on imp­le­men­ta­ti­on, re­mu­n­era­ti­on, costs and re­sults of ac­ti­vi­ti­es in ac­cor­dance with the re­quests of the va­ri­o­us users. Ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on is ava­i­lab­le for a large num­ber of users: the ow­ners, len­ders, cont­rac­tors and rep­re­s­en­ta­ti­ves of govern­ment aut­ho­ri­ti­es, the ma­nag­ement per­son­nel of the com­pany, in­de­pen­dent analysts and au­di­tors, etc. Sci­en­ti­fic li­te­ra­tu­re clas­si­fi­es users by their fea­tu­res. For the pur­po­se of this re­se­arch, the users of ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on are di­vi­ded into an ex­ter­nal and in­ter­nal group.

Ex­ter­nal users are nor­mally out­si­ders of the en­ter­pri­se, but have a di­rect fi­nan­cial in­te­rest in its eco­no­mic ac­ti­vi­ti­es (busi­ness). They inc­lu­de po­ten­ti­al in­ves­tors, cre­di­tors, supp­li­ers, banks, fi­nan­cial and ins­urance com­pa­ni­es. In ad­di­ti­on, there are ex­ter­nal users who have an in­di­rect in­te­rest in and also have a sig­ni­fi­cant im­pact on the busi­ness ac­ti­vi­ti­es of the en­ter­pri­se. These inc­lu­de the fol­lo­wing ins­ti­tu­tions: the tax of­fi­ce, so­ci­al struc­tu­res, supp­li­ers, len­ders, banks, etc.

The se­cond group of users of ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on are in­ter­nal users, who use this in­for­ma­ti­on to re­gu­late busi­ness at the en­ter­pri­se. They inc­lu­de: rep­re­s­en­ta­ti­ves of the com­pany ad­mi­nistra­ti­on, who are res­pon­sib­le for the ob­jec­ti­ves of the en­ter­pri­se, bud­ge­ting and fund­ing units; in­ter­nal au­di­tors and the se­ni­or ma­nag­ement, inc­lu­ding and com­pany ow­ners.

The va­ri­o­us users have comp­let­ely dif­fe­rent in­te­rest. The au­di­tor in­ter­es­ted in the fi­nan­cial sta­te­ments of the com­pany; the tax of­fi­ce is in­ter­es­ted in for­ma­ti­on of the in­for­ma­ti­on about the ob­jects of ta­xa­ti­on; com­pany emp­loye­es want to know their wages; in­ves­tors want to know met­hods and tech­ni­ques of ob­tain­ing pro­fit in­di­ca­tors and cal­cu­lat­ing di­vi­dends; len­ders are in­ter­es­ted in debt re­pay­ment terms, etc. They re­quest ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on for va­ri­o­us kinds of sta­te­ments – fi­nan­cial, tax, ma­nag­ement, sta­tis­tics, etc.

The vast ma­jo­rity of re­quests are made ac­cord­ing to the re­qu­i­re­ments of the ins­ti­tu­tions est­ab­lis­hed in the form of rules that re­gu­late the pro­ce­du­re of dra­wing up and is­su­ing re­ports. The rules of hig­her-le­vel ins­ti­tu­tions are coll­ec­ti­vely called “re­gu­la­tors”. They rep­re­sent at least three le­vels:

Level 1: leg­i­sla­tive re­gu­la­ti­on set out in acts.

Level 2: re­gu­la­ti­on ac­cord­ing to the rules and the re­so­lu­tions of the Ca­bi­net of Mi­nis­ters, mi­nis­t­ri­es, agen­ci­es, de­part­ments.

Level 3: re­gu­la­ti­on set out in rules of the com­pany le­aders­hip.

Th­ro­ugh leg­i­sla­tive acts, the ins­ti­tu­tions ac­ting as re­gu­la­tors on the first and se­cond le­vels (in­ter­na­ti­o­nal ins­ti­tu­tions and the Mi­nistry of Fi­nance of Uk­raine) re­qu­i­re mar­ket par­ti­ci­pants to com­pi­le and sub­mit fi­nan­cial sta­te­ments.

In Uk­raine the first level is rep­re­sen­ted by Act No. 996-XIV of 16 July 1999 “On Ac­count­ing and Fi­nan­cial Re­port­ing in Uk­raine”,11 amen­ded each year, and by Act No. 2755-VI of 12 Feb­ru­ary 2010 (Tax Act), as amen­ded for the last time on 1 July, 2016.12 These acts est­ab­lis­hed the “rules of the game”, in other words, the rules gover­ning ac­count­ing and fi­nan­cial re­port­ing in the first case, and tax re­port­ing to the app­rop­ria­te users and ins­ti­tu­tions in the se­cond.

The se­cond level is based on the Fi­nance Mi­nis­ter’s Dec­ree “On ac­count­ing and fi­nan­cial re­port­ing in Uk­raine”, which sets out the ac­count­ing rules of dra­wing up fi­nan­cial sta­te­ments ac­cord­ing to in­ter­na­ti­o­nal fi­nan­cial re­port­ing stan­dards and the do­m­es­tic ac­count­ing stan­dards de­vel­oped on the basis of in­ter­na­ti­o­nal stan­dards. Every stan­dard spe­ci­fi­es rules for the ba­lance sheet, rules for as­sets, lia­bi­li­ti­es, cost ac­count­ing, etc.

One of the most im­por­tant re­gu­la­tions lays down the rules of the chart of ac­counts and the ac­count­ing in­struc­tions on its use, and re­gu­lates the ac­count­ing and re­port­ing ac­ti­vi­ti­es of in­ter­nal users (and ex­ter­nal – IFRS users). The chart of ac­counts is the cur­rent list of ac­counts that ref­lect the mo­ve­ment of as­sets, lia­bi­li­ti­es, funds, debt, etc. for re­port­ing pur­pos­es.

The third level of the ins­ti­tu­ti­o­nal re­gu­la­ti­on of ac­count­ing and re­port­ing comp­ri­ses the rules of ac­count­ing the en­ter­pri­se adopts – i.e. in­ter­nal re­gu­la­tions. This ac­count­ing po­li­cy, dis­cus­sed el­sew­he­re by the aut­hors,13 sets the re­qu­i­re­ments of ac­count­ing for the com­pany’s in­ter­nal users.​These re­qu­i­re­ments are based pri­ma­rily on the rules the first two ins­ti­tu­tions, which serve as a basis for the se­lec­ti­on of cert­ain tech­ni­ques (ex­cept for the com­pul­sory tax re­port­ing rules) and forms of ac­count­ing based on the acts and cha­rac­te­r­is­tics of the com­pany and ref­lects the com­pany’s ac­count­ing po­li­cy, which sho­uld also pro­vi­de in­for­ma­ti­on on the hig­her-le­vel ins­ti­tu­tions, ex­ter­nal users and ma­nag­ement of the en­ter­pri­se.

This is due to the fact that the ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on must al­ways con­ta­in an ins­ti­tu­ti­on to cont­rol en­ter­pri­se ac­ti­vity and anot­her one (meant for in­ter­nal users) used for fo­re­casting, plan­ning, in­ter­nal cont­rol and the re­gu­la­ti­on of the de­vi­a­tions. The role of ac­count­ing in the fu­tu­re. Will the ma­nag­ement need ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on in the fu­tu­re just as today? Only the ac­count­ing sys­tem has tools or met­hods for creat­ing such in­for­ma­ti­on. The four ac­count­ing met­hods (do­cu­men­ta­ti­on and in­ven­to­ry, as­sess­ment and cost­ing, bills and do­ub­le-ent­ry, and ba­lance and sta­te­ments) serve the ob­ser­va­ti­on of the facts of eco­no­mic life th­ro­ugh data coll­ec­ti­on, me­a­sure­ment (eva­lu­a­ti­on and cal­cu­la­ti­on), re­g­istra­ti­on, bre­ak­down, clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on and ge­ne­ra­li­za­ti­on (in the ac­counts) and the synt­he­sis of data (ba­lance and re­port­ing).

These met­hods, app­li­ed for about five cent­uri­es, are exp­res­sed in a ma­the­ma­ti­cal lan­gu­age that en­ab­les trans­la­ti­on into a mo­dern di­g­ital lan­gu­age. Thus, in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gi­es can pro­vi­de ef­fi­ci­ent, mo­dern met­hods of ac­count­ing. These met­hods are and will be used under any con­di­tions in the co­ur­se of the de­ve­lop­ment of so­ci­ety, inc­lu­ding by the con­di­tions of the fo­urth in­dust­ri­al re­vo­lu­ti­on. Only ac­coun­tants will be able to apply these tech­ni­ques to crea­te the in­for­ma­ti­on ne­ces­sary for users.

Such ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on will al­ways be crea­ted on the basis of pri­ma­ry do­cu­men­ta­ti­on. The lat­ter con­ta­ins in­for­ma­ti­on about the ac­tu­al con­di­ti­on of the en­ter­pri­se or com­mer­ci­al comp­lex, firm or com­pany on a given date. Ac­count­ing est­ab­lis­hes an in­for­ma­tive model of the busi­ness’s eco­no­mic ac­ti­vity, as part of the uni­form in­for­ma­ti­on sys­tem of en­ter­pri­se ma­nag­ement. The cen­ter of this sys­tem is ac­count­ing, which fo­cus­es on the in­for­ma­ti­on about the ac­tu­al state of the func­tion­ing of the en­ter­pri­se. The ac­count­ing sys­tem al­lows the rep­re­s­en­ta­ti­on of the com­pany in a way that is con­ve­ni­ent for mak­ing ma­nag­ement de­ci­sions. The ac­count­ing sys­tem trans­la­ted into an in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­log­i­cal sys­tem works ef­fi­ci­ently. It is very im­por­tant in the de­ve­lop­ment of the so­ci­al and eco­no­mic sys­tem, since it car­ri­es tran­spa­rent in­for­ma­ti­on about all the tran­sac­tions.

Howe­ver, the furt­her de­ve­lop­ment of in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­logy in ac­count­ing and the eco­nomy may re­du­ce the vo­lu­me of the sha­dow eco­nomy, also under the con­di­tions of the fo­urth in­dust­ri­al re­vo­lu­ti­on, using inc­re­as­ed re­qu­i­re­ments or “rules of the game” app­lic­ab­le to the in­for­ma­ti­on en­te­red into the ac­count­ing sys­tem. The new rules will compel par­ti­ci­pants to re­cord all the in­for­ma­ti­on in the sys­tem of ac­counts in an ope­ra­tive and tran­spa­rent man­ner that en­sures cont­rol the re­le­vant ins­ti­tu­tions. This will cont­ri­bu­te to the re­du­cing the sha­dow eco­nomy, on the one hand; and en­ab­les the au­to­ma­tic pre­vent­ion of un­wan­ted de­vi­a­tions or the re­gu­la­ti­on those who al­re­ady have, on­line. This de­ve­lop­ment will cont­ri­bu­te to furt­her imp­ro­ve­ment in the tech­ni­cal equ­ip­ment and in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­logy, which pro­vi­de the basis for the fol­lo­wing re­qu­i­re­ments:

  • in­for­ma­ti­on about any busi­ness ope­ra­ti­on (in new in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gi­es these are called tran­sac­tions) must be inc­lu­ded in the ac­count­ing sys­tem th­ro­ugh spe­ci­al tech­ni­ques that en­sure ef­fi­ci­ency;
  • these tech­ni­cal means must be com­bi­ned in a co­he­rent net­work, ac­cess to which will be rep­re­s­en­ta­ti­ves of the en­ter­pri­se ma­nag­ement and the cont­roll­ing ins­ti­tu­tions;
  • the net­work sho­uld en­sure tran­spa­rency of in­for­ma­ti­on, which is only gran­ted to any eco­no­mic tran­sac­ti­on, it will im­me­dia­tely ap­pear in a com­pu­ter net­work and can be cont­rol­led;
  • all busi­ness tran­sac­tions are car­ried out in a tran­spa­rent man­ner, the pos­si­bi­lity to make pay­ments sol­ely on cash basis by en­ter­pri­ses and ci­ti­zens is exc­lu­ded, as everyone has a bank ac­count and an el­ectro­nic card;
  • these rules or ins­ti­tu­tions sho­uld compel en­ter­pri­ses to trans­fer all pay­ments in non-cash form;
  • all trade points pay the po­pu­la­ti­on in a non-cash form, as every­bo­dy will have bank cards. Any trad­ing net­work has to be equ­ip­ped with ter­mi­nals for the cal­cu­la­ti­on.

The ins­ti­tu­tions that cont­rol en­ter­pri­ses will be able to coll­ect and ge­ne­ra­te ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on about the en­ter­pri­se in­de­pen­dently, on the basis of the ope­rat­ing data the en­ter­pri­ses coll­ect and ac­cu­mu­la­te in their ser­vers. The cont­roll­ing bo­di­es will be able ge­ne­ra­te re­ports using stan­dard al­go­rith­mic pro­ce­du­res. State ins­ti­tu­tions, in par­ti­cu­lar the rep­re­s­en­ta­ti­ves of tax or­ga­ni­za­tions can not only pe­ri­o­di­cally com­pi­le sta­te­ments about busi­nes­ses, but will also be able to ex­erci­se ope­ra­ti­o­nal cont­rol over the eco­no­mic ac­ti­vi­ti­es of the lat­ter. This will fa­ci­li­ta­te tech­ni­cal sup­port and com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on tech­no­lo­gi­es that give great op­por­tuni­ti­es to work with in­for­ma­ti­on in an ope­ra­ti­o­nal mode, as every eco­no­mic tran­sac­ti­on is im­me­dia­tely re­cor­ded in the sys­tem as soon as it is con­duc­ted, and th­ro­ugh the in­ter­net it is trans­fer­red to the users of the sys­tem. Thus the glo­bal net­work of the in­ter­net al­lows users to work with da­ta­bas­es anyw­he­re.

The role and place of the ac­count­ing pro­fes­si­on in the fu­tu­re. Under the new ar­range­ments, the ac­count­ing pro­fes­si­on may be mo­di­fi­ed, as ac­coun­tants may no lon­ger sit in of­fi­ces, since the lat­ter will be rep­la­ced by vir­tu­al of­fi­ces. As a re­sult of a mas­sive de­ve­lop­ment of in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­logy and in the in­ter­net, one will only need to turn on the com­pu­ter and go on­line. This new ac­count­ing of­fi­ce model is highly be­ne­fi­ci­al not only for emp­loye­es, but also emp­loyers: there is no need to rent an of­fi­ce, buy fur­ni­tu­re, com­pu­ters, te­lep­ho­nes and other equ­ip­ment. Spe­ci­al prog­rams and ser­vi­ces can ef­fi­ci­ently mo­ni­tor the per­for­mance of re­mo­tely wor­king emp­loye­es. Te­le­work is the ine­vi­tab­le fu­tu­re.

Howe­ver, there are also more ra­di­cal app­ro­a­ches to chan­ge in this pro­fes­si­on. Ac­cord­ing to E. Ljub­jash­he­va, such changes will af­fect fi­nan­cial analysts, in­vestment au­di­tors, cre­dit inspec­tors, fi­nan­cial cont­rol­lers, pro­fes­si­o­nal in­ves­tors, tra­ders, spe­ci­a­lists in the in­ter­na­ti­o­nal stan­dards of fi­nan­cial ac­counts (MSFO) and fi­nan­cial con­sul­tants.14 In M. Med­ve­dev’s opin­ion, the ac­count­ing pro­fes­si­on will be di­vi­ded into two pro­fes­sions: the ac­coun­tant-no­tary and cre­a­tive-ac­coun­tant.15 Ac­coun­tant-no­ta­ri­es will be re­qu­i­red to en­sure the con­di­tions of per­ma­nent ag­ree­ments, which will be­co­me an im­por­tant tar­get in fu­tu­re com­pu­ter ac­count­ing. More spe­ci­fi­cally, in ad­di­ti­on to the ty­pi­cal tran­sac­tions re­qu­i­red by law, ac­coun­tant-no­ta­ri­es will be able to conc­lu­de tasks re­la­ted to aty­pi­cal ag­ree­ments. The aut­hor re­fers to tran­sac­tions that are not ne­ces­sa­rily con­for­mant with the re­gu­la­to­ry provi­sions, and only ac­coun­tant-no­ta­ri­es will be able to cor­rectly hand­le ag­ree­ments pro­po­s­ed by the ac­count­ing sys­tem.16

Cre­a­tive ac­coun­tants, on the other hand, will imp­le­ment cre­a­tive of ac­count­ing, beyond of­fi­ci­al ac­count­ing, which inc­lu­des the pro­po­s­ed ter­mi­nal that will pro­vi­de data for analy­sis, cont­rol, plan­ning or re­gu­lat­ing a com­pany’s in­ter­nal ac­ti­vity. Ac­cord­ing to the aut­hor of the con­cept, cre­a­tive ac­coun­tants the hig­hest stan­dard will have a spe­ci­al place in so­ci­ety.17

Thus, the comp­le­te com­pu­teri­za­ti­on of ac­count­ing will lead to the aban­don­ment of the use of mo­dern ac­count­ing staff, which will be rep­la­ced by va­ri­o­us al­go­rithms, app­li­ed with the most re­cent tech­ni­cal equ­ip­ment. Cur­rent ac­coun­tants will be rep­la­ced on ac­coun­tant no­ta­ri­es and cre­a­tive ac­coun­tants. Ob­vi­o­usly, this will cause a re­vo­lu­ti­on in the train­ing of the ac­count­ing staff. Per­haps, in such cir­cum­stan­ces ac­coun­tant-program­ming will be a more mar­ke­tab­le pro­fes­si­on.

Howe­ver, in the fu­tu­re, the fo­urth in­dust­ri­al re­vo­lu­ti­on will force prog­ram­mers com­bi­ne their program­ming know­ledge with ac­count­ing, in order to en­sure a place for them­sel­ves in the la­bour mar­ket. In any case, it is im­por­tant to spe­ci­fy the al­go­rithms for in­for­ma­ti­on to any time and any users via the In­ter­net could in­de­pen­dently re­ce­ive the ne­ces­sary data from the ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on sys­tem. In the fu­tu­re in ad­di­ti­on to prog­ram­mers and ac­coun­tants, all other ex­perts who need ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on for their own pur­pos­es will have to be fa­mi­li­ar with these al­go­rithms. They sho­uld be able to se­pa­ra­te that in­for­ma­ti­on from the ge­ne­ral of the array of in­for­ma­ti­on, use it for eva­lu­a­ti­on and analy­sis, cont­rol and re­gu­la­ti­on of the ac­ti­vi­ti­es of the en­ter­pri­se or for other pur­pos­es.

This is why in the fu­tu­re the ac­qui­sit­i­on of ac­count­ing and program­ming know­ledge will be a ne­ces­sity for all the pro­fes­si­o­nals in the eco­nomy, and all will be compel­led to use ac­count­ing in­for­ma­ti­on.

Conc­lu­sions. Firstly, examp­les evi­den­ce that the fo­urth in­dust­ri­al re­vo­lu­ti­on has not disp­la­ced mar­ket ac­coun­tants, alt­ho­ugh their num­ber may have sig­ni­fi­cantly dec­re­as­ed. In­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­logy can comp­let­ely chan­ge ac­count­ing, but in most cases the met­hods of coll­ec­ting, re­cord­ing, sum­ma­ri­zing, sys­te­ma­ti­zing and de­ta­i­ling in­for­ma­ti­on will re­ma­in unc­hang­ed.

Se­condly, in the fu­tu­re the role of ac­count­ing as an ins­ti­tu­ti­on th­ro­ugh which govern­ments est­ab­lish rules to re­gu­late the eco­nomy will not be chang­ed.

Thirdly, the rapid de­ve­lop­ment in tech­ni­cal equ­ip­ment and in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gi­es will re­qu­i­re mar­ket par­ti­ci­pants to enter their data in the ac­count­ing sys­tem and thus the sha­dow eco­nomy will be comp­let­ely eli­mi­na­ted.

Notes

  • 1. Y. M. Hrynchyshyn: Mul­tip­le-as­pect is the role of ac­count­ing and re­port­ing in the an­tich­rists the fi­nan­cial ma­nag­ement of en­ter­pri­ses. Eko­no­mich­ni nauky, Oblik i fi­nansy, Vol. 10, No. 1. (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).
  • 2. O. O. Kant­su­rov: Is­sues of ins­ti­tu­ti­o­nal analy­sis of trends in the de­ve­lop­ment of ac­count­ing. Oblik i fi­nansy Jour­nal, No. 2., 2014, 19–23. (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).
  • 3. S. Kuz­net­so­va: The met­ho­do­log­i­cal prin­cip­les of trans­for­ma­ti­on of ac­count­ing as the di­rec­ti­on of the de­ve­lop­ment of the in­for­ma­ti­on so­ci­ety. Bukh­hal­ters’kyy oblik i audyt Jour­nal, No. 7., 2007, 23–27. (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).
  • 4. M. Med­ve­dev: Ge­ne­ral the­ory of the cal­cu­la­ti­on: the na­tu­ral, book­kee­ping and com­pu­ter met­hods. Delo i ser­vis, Mos­cow, 2001 (in Rus­si­an).
  • 5. N. Tsvyet­ko­va: The es­sen­ce fi­nan­cial re­port­ing in­for­ma­ti­on and its im­pact on the eco­no­mic de­ci­sions of users. Bukh­hal­ters’kyy oblik i audit Jour­nal, No. 8., 2007, 38–45. (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).
  • 6. V. M. Zhuk: Sci­en­ti­fic hy­pot­he­sis in­terp­re­ta­ti­on of ac­count­ing as so­ci­al-eco­no­mic ins­ti­tu­ti­on. Oblik i fi­nansy APK Jour­nal, No. 2., 2012, 14–22. (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).
  • 7. T. M. Slyoz­ko: The de­ve­lop­ment of ac­count­ing in the ins­ti­tu­ti­o­nal en­vi­ron­ment. Vis­nyk KNTEU Jour­nal, No. 3., 2012, 84–93. (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).; Idem: Ac­count­ing in terms of ins­ti­tu­ti­o­nal trans­for­ma­ti­on. The­ory and prac­ti­ce. Mo­no­gra­ph, Centr uch­bo­voji li­te­ra­tury, Kyiv, 2013 (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).; Idem: How in­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­logy can chan­ge the met­ho­do­logy of ac­count­ing. Bukh­hal­ters’kyy oblik i audit Jour­nal, No. 3., 2014, 44–50. (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).; Idem: In­for­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gi­es and the pro­fes­si­on of the book­keeper. Ma­te­rialy mezh­dun-nauch­no-prak. konf. “Vned­re­nie Mezh­du­na­rodnyh stan­dar­tov au­di­ta v Res­pub­li­ke Tadz­hi­kis­tan: prob­lemy i pers­pek­tivy”. Dus­han­be, 29-31 maja 2014 g., “Sok­hib­kor”, 2014, 18–20.; Idem: Ac­count­ing po­li­cy in the con­text of har­mo­ni­za­ti­on and stan­dar­di­za­ti­on of ac­count­ing. Sta­nov­lennya ob­li­ko­voyi po­lity­ky v Uk­rayi­ni. Tezy Vse­uk­ray­ins’koyi nauk. konf. 18-19 trav­nya, Ter­no­pil, TNEU, 2007, 196–197. (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).; N. P. Za­ho­rod­nya: Human ca­p­ital and mo­dern is­sues of in­no­va­tive de­ve­lop­ment of the count­ry. Na­u­ko­vi roz­rob­ky, pe­re­dovi tekh­no­lo­hiyi, in­no­vat­siyi. Zbir nauk. pr. ta tez. nauk. dopov. za mater. III Mizh­na­rod­noyi nauk.​prak. kon­fe­rent­sii, NDISR, Kyiv, 2016, 75–80. (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).
  • 8. An­ders Borg: Inf­lu­en­ce of the Fo­urth In­dust­ri­al Re­vo­lu­ti­on on the eco­no­mic po­li­cy. WEF, 2016.
  • 9. K. Shvab: Fo­urth in­dust­ri­al re­vo­lu­ti­on: calls and the pos­si­bi­lity. 31. 01. 2016. http://​hvylya.​net/​analytics/​society/​chetvertaya-industrialnaya-revolyutsiya-vyizovyi-i-vozmozhnosti.​html (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).
  • 10. Borg op. cit.
  • 11. Law of Uk­raine “On ac­count­ing and fi­nan­cial re­port­ing in Uk­raine” from 16. 07. 1999, 996-XIV.
  • 12. The tax code of Uk­raine, the Verk­hov­na Rada app­ro­ved 02. 12. 2010, no. 2755-VI with changes and amend­ments in the last edi­ti­on of the 01. 07. 2016.
  • 13. Slyoz­ko: Ac­count­ing in terms of ins­ti­tu­ti­o­nal…, op. cit.; Idem: Ac­count­ing po­li­cy in the con­text…, op. cit.
  • 14. E. Ljub­jash­he­va: Fu­tu­re of fi­nan­cial pro­fes­si­on. 2016. http://​blogs.​eizvestia.​com/​full/​287-budushheefinansovoj-professii (in Uk­ra­i­ni­an).
  • 15. Med­ve­dev, op. cit.
  • 16. Ibid.
  • 17. Ibid.